THE SOCIAL - ECOLOGICAL DOCTRINE of RUSSIA
WE, PARTICIPANTS of FORMING of the PRESENT DOCUMENT,
- Understanding the social - ecological doctrine as a scientific and political system, guide in the field of management of nature and environmental protection for the most effective life support of the person,
- Declaring major value human life, physical health and psychological state of the people in the natural they natural and social environment,
- Recognizing, that the person was, is and should remain a biological and social entity, for which one favorable natural and social settings in all parts a pattern, in miscellaneous countries are equally indispensable for healthy and harmonic existence and progressing,
- Being are convinced of lasting value of natural resourcess for the existence of the Person and Mankind - major value in comparison with any by other: political, religious, economical, ambitious and diverse,
- Being are concerned with a state of an ambient environment in Russian Federation, in a pattern,
- Being are especially concerned by severe losses for the Person and Nature from the thoughtless and short-sighted introducing new and unreasoned upgrading of the operational managing objects without the full registration of their negative environmental impact,
- Understanding the responsibility before the own people and peoples of other countries on a planet for negative consequences from anthropogenous activity, which one is tracked by global violations(disturbance) of steadied natural processes and the more so by exception of not completed natural resources,
- Considering expertise and positive outcomes of activity, stored Russian entitiess and world community during the solution by them of social and ecological problems,
- Recognizing relevance of the preventive measures on conservation of an environment and meliorating of social settings of habitability of the citizens of Russia, population of countries, interacting to her, all inhabitants of a Planet,
- Considering, that the strife for stainless social and ecological conditions of existence of the people testing(experiencing) negative anthropogenous effects, can be to rallying of the people, entitiess, countries, peoples with the different political and ideological installations,
- Referring on the numerous independent applications of miscellaneous countries and entitiess about availability of close co-operation in business of strife for a maximum clean social and ecological habitat,
- Recognizing necessity of the introducing of permanent effective controlling instruments of problems of management of nature, conservation and облагораживания of an ambient natural and social habitat of human community,
- Recognizing, that by most effective in the field of supply and the progressings of a natural conservation are only precisely formulated, государственно gated in and общественно monitored controlling instruments of processes and phenomena,
WE REGARD NECESSARY:
In the field of the RIGHTS of the CITIZENS
- 1. To accept among fundamental laws of the person the right of defence it(him) on the part of the state from negative natural and anthropogenous effects;
- 2. To recognize unconditionally to immoral and absolutely invalid deposition as the citizens, legal and natural persons, states and communities one another of any harm - physical, material, economical, ecological, social, moral... Without subsequent with inevitability of full and well-timed indemnification(compensation) of plotted damage;
In a PART of FORMING of a SYSTEM of SOCIAL - ECOLOGICAL PROGRESSING
- 3. To consider(count) unconditionally indispensable cooperation with all design forces of a planet for survival and progressing of mankind, for the future celebration of goods above evil;
- 4. To consider(count) as the special threat for a survival of mankind, his(its) present and future, mass destructive anthropogenous processes, including issue(emission) from firms in an atmosphere so-called « парниковых of gases », exception of irreplaceable natural resources, and also distribution(propagation) of harmful matters as actuations in commodity and occurrence(appearance) вредоносных of processes at exploitation (usage) of made commodity and at production activity of raw indispensable for activity of firms;
- 5. To accept as indispensable and sufficient yardstick of a rating of negative anthropogenous and natural effect social and economic damage from deposition of any harm and effect from effect positive - вс ё from a stand of concerns of the person and human community as a whole;
- 6. To place(install) as the major social and economic gear of conservation both meliorating of a social and ecological habitat of the person the gear of well-timed and full indemnification(compensation) of all plotted damage without dependence from conditions of his(its) genesis; according to a native born image to rework a system of a rating of environmental impact (ОВОС) to supplement a usual threshold system of certification « on correspondence » by an analog network of social - ecological certification of products and productions; instead of the ecological passport(certificate) to enter the social - ecological passport(certificate) of firm. A main purpose of all these variations should become the introducing of a rating of plotted damage from природоразрушительной and introduced effect from природовосстановительной of activity - on a state and in the speaker;
- 7. To place(install) as an indispensable and sufficient fundamentals for investment in nature protection activity and for dimensioning the investments, especially and specially from the budgetary funds demonstrated minimum - guaranteed value of social - ecological effect with installation of the indispensable apportionment of liability for his(its) implementation of the persons, the investments, receiving the data;
In the field of SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY of the MANAGING SUBJECTS
- 8. To charge of all entitiess to effect regular monitoring of any own positive and negative environmental impacts обитания with rendering of the main(basic) total - rating of an extent of effect in absolute cost and relative units and design of the reporting about them before official bodies, public organizations and population (citizens);
- 9. To bind firms at opening-up of input datas for realization of a social - ecological rating of own activity and performance of scientific developments, sold by them, to allow for effect from substitution of a natural non-renewable resources with less valuable natural or artificial materials and secondary raw, with allowance for ассимиляционной of capacitance of an environment;
- 10. To consider(count) expedient to enter into the reports of the chiefs of Administration of locales, Federal government and in a President's Message to federal Assembly mandatory sections of Social - ecological progressing with allocation of a public of the capacious and all-inclusive information about positive and - or negative shears in social - ecological progressing with the integral performance of the obtained effect or allowed damage;
- 11. To place(install), that of the speaker of resultant shears (variations) of effect and damage for the population with allowance for of made costs should become an indispensable and sufficient parameter(index) at definition of personnel and financial conclusions(injections) for the applicable services and manual of firms, locales and report before the employees and электоратом;
In the INTERNATIONAL SCHEDULE
- 12. To back up spirit « Киотского of the minutes », saving, however, disappointment by his(its) character and including gears of his(its) implementation excessively complicated, ambiguous, irrelevant with plotted damage and already therefore малоэффективными; it is no wonder thus, that some of the states have refused it(him) to ratify;
- 13. To recognize illegality of any forms(shapes) of an allocation and transfer(transmission) as countries one another of any so-called rights and quota& on a pollution of the environment - social and natural - and to achieve an admission at an international level of a system of repayment of plotted damage from countries with the best contribution to global impurity for the benefit of countries with the minimum contribution;
- 14. To achieve at an international level, including through entitiess of the United Nations, admission of mutually plotted damage as alone, indispensable and sufficient yardstick at mutual ratings and calculations from consequences at трансграничных effects on the population and on economy of neighbouring countries, and at global effects - in general of all countries influenced;
- 15. To achieve at an international level of an admission of necessity to bear a full liability for all consequences from social - negative, destructive economical and diverse activity of countries, entitiess and separate citizens without dependence from their motives - religious, political, national, material, ambitious, moral and any diverse;
- 16. To undertake unilaterally, as a first step, indemnification(compensation) of all kinds(views) plotted to other countries and peoples of social - ecological, economical and other damage from again entered productions and to expect the same pitch from other countries;
About ATTEMPTED And FURTHER MEASURES of a software to PERFECTING of a SYSTEM of SOCIAL - ECOLOGICAL PROGRESSING
- 17. To recognize unconditionally relevant further learning of effective gears, suitable for constructing, of public progressing of outcomes exploratory and creative activities of federal, regional, national and international entitiess, independent groups, collectives and separate specialists (including outcomes of development and implementation of systems of ecological monitoring, экономико- and social - ecological ratings, social - ecological certification of products and productions on performance, quality and ecological purity, ecological certification of nature protection activity etc.) with engaging of their implementators for constant perfecting and implementation of all rules(situations,positions) of this Doctrine, including an orb of economy (economical attitudes(relations)), социомики (social attitudes(relations)) and ecology (attitudes(relations) human community - nature). These activities previously conducted, have allowed to form the present Doctrine and to justify for themselves общественно the conditioned sense to insist on necessity е ё of implementation in Russia;
- 18. To leave with the proposal in the United Nations about entitiess of look-alike activities at an international and global level in a scale of countries and peoples realizing the concern and the responsibility for supply of world social and ecological safety and public progressing; thus Russia is ready to undertake a role of the organizer of these activities, and also teaching and transfer(transmission) available for not ё of expertise to the specialists of other countries;
- 19. To offer to all participants of social - ecological progressing to place(install) a constructive dialogue with all forces and entitiess, including nature protection, антиглобалистскими and them(him,it) look-alike - at all not recognizing their today's methods permissible and effective;
- 20. To address to world community with the request to back up creation at the United Nations (or under aegis of the United Nations) international entitiess for methodical and organizational regulation on the unified methodical basis(fundamentals) of the alphabet of public progressing, including for development and implementation of a world-wide (world-wide) system material and moral incentive of the writers, implementators and participants of implementation maximum общественно of effective achievements with awarding by him(it) uniform for all the pattern of creative extents is strict according to the general contribution to public progressing - manufacturing, social, ecological and diverse. The initiative on creation of such project (World-wide Committee "«Progressing") for activity in bridge with the Nobel committee, not invading in the niche,(well,) held by him(it), is ready to undertake Russia.
-
The given Project (as of 3.08.2001 years) is prepared by International Academy of public progressing (President - Минин Б.А.) under the proposal and at direct involvement of the workers of the vehicle of Administration of the President of Russia.
THE CO-AUTHORS (under the order of hooking up to development): МИНИН Б.А., АНИКИЕВ В.В....
We invite all to cooperation
HELPS on telephones (095) 241-38-08, 39-03, Минин Борис Алексеевич
THE FUTURE — BEHIND PHILOSOPHY of PUBLIC PROGRESSING
(To " to a philosophical problem " in ВАКе)
Э.С. Демиденко, д.филос.н., professor Bryansk педуниверситета
Б.А. Минин, д.экон.н., professor,
The chairman of expert Council ГосДумы Russian Federation,
The president of International Academy of public progressing
On our view, ВАК too hasty solves the problem on substitution of candidate examination on philosophy on " philosophy of science ". Whether it is necessary to change an awl for a soap? Or, probably, there is something more essential, what the philosophers can give to company?
The opponents of candidate examination on philosophy refer that in conditions of pluralism, "democracies" should concede almost all rivaling philosophical doctrine, that is it is as though difficult, if it is possible basically, any to prefer. The mums everyones are necessary... Quite often, on the contrary, to philosophy concern as to one of many equivalent sciences furthermore giving only the most communal world outlook submissions(representations). However, in what we are sure, at correct (i.e. from the point of view of concerns of public progressing and conservation of biosphere on the Earth) understanding a pattern, philosophy can and should become by the major tool of forming of the best future for all of us.
Already now philosophy вс ё is more and invades in practical human life more. First of all, she allows not only deeply to learn of patterns of the nature and person, but also more effectively to do(make) аксиологический analysis of happening events and устремленных in the future of processes. But is, unfortunately, in philosophy, is more exact — in a fashion е ё of teaching, one малоприятная a feature, which one, between that, is rigidly exhibited at learning and delivery of candidate examination on philosophy. In the programs try to enter dosed slices of philosophy — from an ontology, epistemology, social philosophy, social anthropology, history of philosophy etc., not giving the unified philosophically interpreted oilpainting a pattern, scientific forecasts effective конструкта.
The proposal on forming " philosophies of science " not without interest, but rather restrictedly. Philosophy in that or diverse field(area) of knowledge, in which one collects to work the future scientist, when he hands the candidate minimum on a speciality, owes is foregone to be present at his(its) system knowledge. If е ё no, there is no also profound knowledge of a subject. Therefore most likely here it is necessary to go on a path of recess of candidate examinations on a speciality, augmenting,maybe, quantity of examinations, having added, for example, history and philosophy of that scientific branch, in which one the future scientist collects to work. Not the knowledge of a methodology е ё of scientific studies, including learning not only methods of the science, but also сопредельных of sciences would be superfluous also. But вс ё it as though science for science.
On our view, now have ripened directional variations and in a methodology of teaching, and in a contents of candidate examination on philosophy as a whole. Give with you we shall deliver a problem so: for what the science is in general necessary, from what science and suffers now than she does not content(fit) today's public needs(requirements)?
At first, the science, under the large score, is necessary is not simple for satisfaction of our inquisitiveness about ambient us to a pattern (though also it is not eliminated). No, the science is not so much major tool of knowledge, how much, major, — of transformation(conversion) a pattern in a name of satisfaction of vital public and personal needs(requirements), in a name normal and the harmonic public progressing suffices.
Secondly, now it becomes clear: the public progressing should originate at maximum conservation of the nature, a part by which one, by the way, is also person. Now scientific (and in particular(personally) — philosophical) the disciplines вс ё more often appear as isolated from each other, and they not decide a problematics of progressing our earth pattern as a whole, but only separate parts, on business rather connected. And decide, as a rule, at a defiance of concerns of company, at the expense of which one the science also exists. such mismatch rather often results (and is simple can to result) to разбалансированности of progressing of communities, races, branches many locales, Earth as a whole. A vivid example to that is progressing locale of lake of Baikal. The concluding on building around of him(it) of firms was given by(with) large scientific and research and development institutes — and gave despite of enormous damage for an ambient environment, which one by him(it) indicated more than once and not two. Gave contrary to the protests of a public, contrary to the logician of life, contrary to intuitive intuition of the recognized nature of natural and public progressing. Gave and till now give thanking or limited knowledge, not twisted in a unified system, or absolute irresponsibility for enabled(granted) damage to the nature and mankind. And such examples to not find!
All of us see, that the science in that е ё a kind(view), in which one she now exists, not only does not content(fit) to public needs(requirements), but also bates the foundation of life on a planet the Earth. Yes, in a noticeable extent due to science, broad usage of its(her) result ins XX century the large part of mankind is quick enough(rapid enough) left from poverty and has received significant(sizeable) oofs. For last 100 years number of the rich and well-to-do people on a terrestrial globe was increased from 1 % till 43-45 of %, in absolute digits — approximately in 200 times. But at the same time extremely has grown to disappear between rich and poor countries, by the rich and poor people. And the oofs of the people increase basically at the expense of destruction(annihilation) of biosphere and biological matter of a planet. On the most retiring countings, only in XX century the mankind has erased the fourth part биоты. It kills also foundation биоты, first of all of vegetative life — of an ecosystem and soil. In the same century is erased up to third гумусного of a stratum in treated grounds. In two - three centuries, if not earlier, we shall appear on sands and clay physically not which is capable to give to us nutrition.
Besides the nature, mainly animals, and person are exposed not only anthropogenous impurities, but also degradation. The person as a tribal entity, on the one hand, is quick(rapid) accumulates the social qualities, and with other — loses the natural properties: his(its) immune system is loosened, he is exposed dangerous, so-called цивилизационным to illnesses and even to degeneration. In course техногенного of natural public progressing the megalopolises, техносфера as a whole expand, which one вс ё encompass biosphere, not keeping any chances for its(her) self-progressing more.
It also causes(urges) us to raise the question about переориентировании of the view on philosophy and necessities of an ex-traction from the already available huge material which has been well run in by the philosophers, new discipline — of philosophy of public progressing, which one will incorporate also best, maximum expertise philosophical past, and the methodological operating time(running times) of the present, where will be the urgent questions of sciences about the Earth and company are taken into account(discounted) most. Each scientist owes from a stand of concerns of transition on normal, steady progressing of company and biosphere, Earth as a whole, to study and to learn(teach) to pose and to decide problems of oriented social - natural progressing of the science, but major — as a whole of human community and biosphere at the expense of the science. From this stand, parsing expertise of past breeds of the philosophers, it is expedient to extract from him(it) all useful for the future mankind — instead of branch, or clan. The science should cease be " for itself ", she should become " for us " — and in the schedule предугадывания of the future and major — of his(its) constructing.
For example, for a solution of a problem of a feed(meal,power) of rising number of the inhabitants will be used трансгенный a method at cultivation of vegetative food, including by the introducing of genes of animals in генный the vehicle of plants. Probably, it now best output(exit). But his(its) applicability should be rated only with allowance for of concerns of all community of the people and from a stand of conservation of biosphere, биосферной of the nature, биосферного of the person. The second example concerns a problem, which one has delivered ещ ё Д.И. Менделеев: whether it was better to incinerate органику (forest, plants, coal, oil etc.), and to beneficiate by them with soils and to gain good harvests биосферных of plants. This advice of the large scientist of Russia is now superactual.
such problems before each particular science is put much. And only philosophical, the generalized approach from a stand of steady progressing of company and nature can to give the fullest answer. Philosophies on a shoulder(arm) to find and to prepare for implementation gears of permissions and prohibitions in field(area) техногенного of progressing and in general implementations of especially revolutionary novations. It is clear, that only by administrative actions of all problems upgrading of a social production to not decide. Scientific — the lawyers, ecologists, sociologists and many other — quite could as a screen insist to the introducing in our country of the requirement of repayment guilty of all damage, plotted to company, from destruction(annihilation) of resources(safe lifes) — including damage by the way of biological degradation from a pollution of the environment and other parasite effects of the people. Above each of us — and scientist equally — should permanently hang(hover) Дамоклов меч of the responsibility for all our businesses.
To note, to evaluate, спрогнозировать all global variations and major — in time to offer the generalized design solutions the philosophy as the professionally formed institute of human activity can only, which one is capable creatively to generalize outcomes of mass of separate sciences and which one now can appear — already in completely new comprehension of public progress — in quality the gen designer of our future.
Not dressed specially by this responsibility, the philosophers of miscellaneous times and peoples not always executed(designed) such or look-alike function. The problem consists in reorientation of our programs on philosophy (and accordingly programs of a philosophical minimum) in a comprehensive rating of each philosopher, each philosophical doctrine, in general of each scientist and specialist from a stand of their contribution in public — for today steady, коэволюционное — progressing envisioning as the main(basic) generated purpose conservation of biolife and human community on our planet.
While, alas, we do not have any doubts that skill to use abstract concepts, scientific nomenclature, by knowledge absolutely not necessarily coincide with thirst to be to concerns of human community. Or even with comprehension of necessity it to do(make).
The most convincing argument for the benefit of our reliance(confidence) can be вс ё ещ ё a problem, remaining without the answer: so that it is better — of capitalism or socialism? Or, probably, there should be something third in a social system? While there is no developed philosophy of public progressing, we on this problem of the answer shall not find. We can not answer and such where more communal problem: whether to return preference to concerns the individual, indefinitely reaming his(its) rights, or to subordinate to his(its) concerns of collective? The atoms in free space are indefinitely more free, than in a pencil. But we have pencil!
Whether also there are present social - democratic shears is simple by the well balanced destruction " of malicious forces "? We know very much much from inconsistencies of modern public progressing, we have considerable knowledge of paths of their overcoming, and the best minds(wits) of Russia could is massed to introduce вс ё it in a kind(view) unified the educational program to compound and to write добротные the tutorials and manuals in the given subject. While it would be the concentrate rather separate and разноликого of expertise present and past breeds. But we could is active to execute a crystallization of new science of the present and future — philosophy of public progressing, stimulating in her and looking up of sense of a survival of mankind, and recess of comprehension essence of progress, construction and destruction of phenomena, stability(immunity) and decay(disintegration), changes of aircraft attitude and коэволюции of mankind and biosphere.
Thus, the substitution of candidate examination on philosophy on examination in philosophy of public progressing would be quite justified as the relevant pitch to creation of the effective gear of active forming of the positive future — instead of a stand his(its) indirect spectator.
The encyclopedia "2000"
THE SPECIFICATION STATEMENT of the PROJECT
The project guesses opening-up for issuing,, Encyclopedia "2000" with emanating and subsequent specification statement of two thousand achievements, which one have made our Civilization such, instead of diverse (the economic-mathematical vehicle for this purpose already is present).
According to our concept and from our point of view - with общепонимаемой by logic, the public significance of achievement will be the more, than more what achievement potentially affects, and also than it is more and than longer this effect, т. е. in the total than more full anticipated (potential) effect.
What the achievement, novelty affects, is determined by an annual cost of production of subjects (objects) of effect, or SCALE of PRODUCTION.
, how affects: is, in our terms PERFORMANCE. The effect the is more, т. е. The performance the above, than better and than becomes cheaper the object of effect. That is the performance consists of two parts. We are ready, that was and more dearly(more expensively): Д> 1, but then it is much better, т. е. A degree of quality К> > 1.
Performance Е = (To - Д). She should be always more than zero point. Than she is more, the better. By the way, (To - Д) also there is mysterious synergetic, a cooperative effect - major parameter(index) of outcome of creativity and intensive upgrading of production. At To = Д available extensive process.
Effect Э = М. (К-Д) - economic benefit of usage of any novelty.
So the annual economic benefit Эгэ in production of goods is determined also. But this formula is universal enough.
At social upgrading of production the situation is those: for Кл of the people during the Hardware of hours annually (it is a scale of social production) condition become better in Кс of time. The calculation of a social scale (Мс) is given below, and Кс, the level of social quality, is determined or subjectively, sociological interrogation, or under the complex(difficult) formulas, which one we here do not present (see literature at the end of the text). Still here it is necessary to take into account saving of personal money resources of the population and spare time.
For scientific production the scale is easier for defining(determining) all through a volume of the publications (About) in periodic (scientific and other) literature, the essence which one completely or is partially crossed, "is zeroed" by achievement.
The full annual effect is peer to the sum of proprietary annual effects.
But generally speaking, at the performance of a novelty us not the single or even not annual scoring from substitution of the baseline object usually interests, or " of public practice " on the object new (freshened), and full potential (П) during, while the novelty will be new and useful. This time is called so: " term of an obsolescence ", MASS-MEDIA (Т). It depends on two factors: from initial performance Ео rather " of public practice " (which one in itself slowly эволюционирует) and from a level of adherence to principles, " of a creative level " a television instituted(spotted) by three main(basic) parameters(indexes).
Briefly their essence.
1) If you the new wing for an airplane is made is one. And if the new flight vehicle (not an airship, not an airplane and not the helicopter is made...), this achievement with odds "will live" much longer, than his(its) part, in abundance acquiring the details - not helicopter and not aircraft.
The extent of rise on a hierarchy of the solutions determines a Level of generalizing THAT. The level of generalizing is determined on the International qualifier of the inventions (МКИ) or on the Universal qualifier (УДК), about which one know in any library.
2. Important parameter(index) of a creative level - Level of stability(immunity) THAT of achievement as systems. From the theory of systems it is known, that the more number of members, subsystems is contained by(with) a system, the she is less steady (and in a square). For example, any патентовед knows, that than more "tags" for the invention (and, therefore, the more quantity of words Кслов in the formula of the invention), the is more lighter than it(him) "to bypass", having substituted one tag on other and уйдя from under operating of the patent.
3) If for a long time it was necessary and it is possible to make the invention, but nobody has guessed, and for this latent period ЛП (latent time of maturing) the people far have left in "нитуда" and have accumulated mass of problems, and расхлебывать them it is necessary very long. And as long it is necessary to wait for the new radical solutions.
The supervision(observation) and statistical physics confirm all this. This phenomenon is allowed in our method of applications as " a Level неочевидности " ТН. He actuates as well the registration of number of the writers Кавт: a history and Practice inevitably testify to one: the creativity is a personal activity, the collectives finish and design(elaborate).
Creative level ТВ=ТО.ТН.ТУ.
So, the initial performance and creative level determines prospects, term of an obsolescence Т of a novelty. The design formulas will be given below.
By the real data, invention, discovery, development, in general novelties provide rather miscellaneous MASS-MEDIA - from 1 year till 50 years. They differ on a scale and annual effect - in many millions time even more. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority scientific, innovators is held by creation absolutely tiny on a scale of usage of novelties.
In general overwhelming majority of the people, has surprising narrow horizons of concerns, мирок them мышиных норок narrow and crude, the submissions(representation) impressed up to limits of one-two dimensional space, the outlook is narrowed down, tastes, - all: - material, spiritual... Primitive. Same on a level and products of their habitability. Well, how here to not recollect about Заратустрее Фридриха Ницше?!
But there are titaniums successfully encroaching on rather significant volumes of a social production, almost on the whole branches. All this mirrors our rank.
So, we have told separately about all main(basic) parameters(indexes) defining
п about l н for ю public usefulness of novelties.
But following aspect of a rating. The novelty is usual, certainly, all and at once with pleasure do not perceive. Purely, if it has taken place, then also rating would be not mandatory, and so, for self-satisfaction.
Usually to us access at a stage of despair: the idea is also she is not bad demonstrated (I replicate, the evidences - separate, essential a stage) - all this are, but where there are no facilitiess to conduct the applicable studies or experiment, where - development, especially - implementation. And than the idea is less natural stages of implementation has passed, the less proof of a novelty, the less odds of usage of a full potential (В). The registration at once "touches down" it(him) any idea, reduces(descends) scope(span) of values of a potential, отрезвляет. But without it(her) the rating can not be considered valuable.
There is one more reason of occurrence(appearance) of equivocation of calculations. Any currency is astable, rouble while - specially, therefore more visually values of annual effect and potential to express not in currency, and in terms of of productivity(output) of one mean citizen (СПР). The Demonstrated relative annual effect " ЭДО thus is received ". He determines, in how much of time средневероятный the annual effect from a novelty is more than productivity(output) of one mean citizen.
Product Эг (руб/year) on Т (years) gives a full potential ПП (in roubles), which one determines п about l н ы й effect from full upgrading of all production of a scale of M for Т of years. Value practically not real. And with allowance for oddss In is determined a quite real potential П (too in roubles).
Not only in roubles (or in brands, dollars...), but even in relative units the scope(span) of potentials is rather great: from 1 up to 106.. 8 and more. To not operate with digits such as 150220 or 110200000, we use taking the logarithm, having called received value by a RANK. The rank R- is a Brigg's logarithm of value П / СПГ.
Scope(span) of values of ranks from 0 up to 8... 9 - quite friend for perception of digit. By the way, meaning such huge scope(span) in a significance of novelties, billion of time, error in ratings on + - 0,5... 1 ед. (in three... Ten times) not seems черезмерной.
The calculation in relative units decides some it would seem not decided problems of a rating of a significance of novelties for example, Земмельвайса, which one in middle of past century has uncovered a reason universal then in Europe двадцатипроцентной (!) Death rate of the parturient women in hospitals and only intuitively - microbes then did not know! - has found best till now antiseptic: a chlorinated lime. A rating in cost units, which one we have made, was as is not absolutely convincing and for ourselves. If to proceed(pass) to a rating with allowance for СПР (about 15 life on each one thousand the person of the population), the value not salvaged for 50 years неприятия by official science and practice of those years of the proposal Земмельвайса 100 млн of the mothers, on 2 млн annually, gives a rank R=lg2х106/0,015 = lg1,4х108=8,2 - value, by the way very close to obtained on the basis of cost calculations, but is much more representative.
THE TENDERED FORMS(SHAPES) of COMMERCIAL IMPLEMENTATION of the PROJECT: sale of the books
THE DATA About COMPETITIVE SYSTEMS: the look-alike issuings are not known. We are the holders(owners) of the economic-mathematical vehicle, which one in the best extent approaches for fulfilment of the tendered project. The issuing of the ENCYCLOPEDIA "2000" will promote implementation in consciousness of masses and statesmen of idea of maximum priority социльных and humanitarian purposes before economical and material.
THE CHIEF of the PROJECT: МИНИН БОРИС АЛЕКСЕЕВИЧ, candidate of engineering science, doctor of economical sciences; the writer more 100 scientific activities, 15 copyright certificates and 2 patents; the chief of development " Systems of certification of quality " SCQ and " About ecological certification of products - goods and services "; vice-president of Separation of public progressing of International Academy of informatization (МАИ); the president of Federal Center of certification; the director of Methodical center of certification of quality (founders of Methodical center - МАИ and ЦНИИбыт).
THE LOG-BOOK « TALENT of PUBLIC PROGRESSING »
Headings of the log-book
The incidental points on sections
1. Today and tomorrow of public progressing (Page of the major editor) .
2. Our honorary certificates (about those who was awarded)
ПЕРСОНАЛИИ And CHRONICLE of DAY
3. Chronology of public progressing (where, that, when)
4. Great women
5. Nobel winners holding and future(next,in future)
6. Anatomy Record-type Гиннесса
7. Our foreign friends .
8. Person both company: a selfdefence and self-progressing
POLICY of OUR PROGRESSING
9. Shop psychology — the relevant brake on social progress
10. To a Great Social revolution (Reversionary right and Forward(straight) democracy)
11. Miracles in a social orb (from an ancient history up to now)
12. Than shall meet ХХIй (message from
all branches, political parties and religions) .
13. Science of the future. Creative extents of public progressing — not clone ВАК
14. Outlook Nobel номинаций
15. To the Encyclopedia "«2000" — the best 2000 achievements of mankind after 2000 AD.
16. About social safety and social progressing
17. Problem national, not most ill
18. Policy and public progressing. How to stage elections?
19. Market, business and person.
TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS and PUBLIC PROGRESSING
20. Money and public progressing
21. MASS-MEDIA and public progressing
22. Engineering and public progressing
23. "«Interface", paths of perfecting PC
24. Internet — for his(its) large future .
25. Ecology and public progressing
THE NATURE And WE
26. Green patterns, our friend and enemy
27. The spoilt nature (about an animal, which one we have tainted also which one... Spoil us)
28. Violent sex — for and against
29. Alternate medicine
30. Best healers and маги, demonstrating the performance
31. Our visitor — "«Анастасия" .
32. Noncommercial art
ИСКУСCТВО And PUBLIC PROGRESSING
33. Divine through music (history from a music world: all genres, which one not subject of time)
34. Joke — but as a phenomenon public progress .
35. From the book « a Sidereal path »
"«ACADEMICIAN" — MAKE ITSELF!
36. To grow old not hurrying up
37. To be better than everything, but to be liked
38. How to work with normal conservative
39. Club of lone hearts
40. Not national galley .
41. Feature of social expertise
TECHNICAL ЛИКБЕЗ
42. How to calculate, that you face
43. Certification of quality and ecological certification: how it is done(made)? .
44. Interesting achievements (on a self-rating of the writers)
VOICE of the READERS
45. Elapsed certification the goods: best and most clean
46. НОВИСТИКА (Fair общеполезных of ideas and achievements on special algorithm, and also brief authoring proposals of the books, articles for the subsequent realization of their auction among the publishers)
47. Best of other newspapers and log-books (from the writers and editions)
48. Legal advices(legal advice offices)
|
